Radcliffe shedding away from Harry Potter
September 27th 2008 00:46
:
Harry Potter-Daniel Radcliffe
So well i was a big fan of Daniel Radcliffe when he was young, and well when i was young. But not anymore... he's not that cute when he grows up. He's more manly but not that cute. So finally there's some news about him but not about Harry Potter but well him.
Its a long text, oh well you can read it here or on Omg, i took it from there.
So well he is stepping out and trying different things, and thats great. I guess he's just too old for potter anymore but oh well the series almost ending. So well it would be great to see more of Radcliffe shwoing of his skills don't you think??
Its a long text, oh well you can read it here or on Omg, i took it from there.
After all the fuss, after all the double entendres about "wands" and "quidditch balls", after the scandalous photos, after all the talk and gossip and rumors...the play remains. And it is the play that reigns supreme at the Broadhurst Theater where Peter Shaffer's compelling and intoxicating drama, Equus, has received a stunning new production that stars a little known newcomer by the name of Harry Potter, er, I mean Daniel Radcliffe.
Tuesday night I attended a press preview of Equus. I went in with many questions. Would Radcliffe be up to the task? Would the nudity be gratuitous? Could I erase the image of Harry Potter from my mind as I watched the play? But, as the curtain went up and the opening image of Radcliffe, shirtless, surrounded by actors in metal horse heads came to life...all my questions and concerns seemed to disappear.
Equus, the play itself, is really quite riveting. Written in the 70's, nearly 35 years ago, the play really stands the test of time. Yes, some of the psychiatric techniques are dated, and some moments may lose their impact three decades later in this psycho-driven therapy filled world we live in. But, the building blocks of great theater are all on display here. Compelling conflict, nuanced characters, interesting subject matter. Equus shows us all of this and more.
The play is pretty simple. A young teen-age boy is brought to a psychiatric center for treatment. He has blinded several horses and has narrowly escaped prison in exchange for extensive counseling. Alan, the boy, is volatile and uncooperative and it is up to his doctor, Martin Dysart, to attempt to discover what has happened to the boy and help him stumble down a road to recovery.
Bringing this drama to life requires two great actors and this production has found them in Richard Griffiths and Daniel Radcliffe. Yup, you read that correctly - I said "great" and Daniel Radcliffe in the same sentence. I think everyone expected Mr. Griffiths to be great. He has already wowed New Yorkers in The History Boys several seasons back. But, Harry Potter, I think folks have been "gunning for him", so to speak. I am happy to report that he is marvelous in the role. Both actors should be favorably remembered at Tony time in the Spring. Radcliffe embodies his character and is the pulsing, dynamic, irrational center of Equus. He holds his own quite well with Mr. Griffiths and is especially powerful in his final scenes when he is forced to recount the tragic events that have been his undoing. These two are very nicely supported by a cast of New Yorkers (giving good accents). Anna Camp as the young stable girl and T. Ryder Smith particularly impressed this theatergoer.
I would be remiss if I did not mention the excellent directing of the production. Thea Sharrock, who directed the London run, does a wonderful job. It is a spare and sleek production. There is no actual set, really, several black cubes are moved around to create couches and chairs - and it works magnificently, allowing the shifts in time and place to happen in the blink of an eye with no effort. I was also quite impressed with her use of the horses. She used a stable of actors (pun intended) with simple metal horse heads, with raised hooves and dressed all in brown to create the much talked about group of horses. It was simple, evocative, powerful and moving (at times). Kudos to her creative team as well; set and costume designer John Napier, lighting designer David Hersey and sound designer Gregory Clarke.
Clearly, I enjoyed the show...now...let's see what the critics had to say about the latest arrival on "The Broadway".
Review Round-Up
Ben Brantley - The New York Times - click HERE to read the full review.
Mr. Brantley and I disagree, to some extent. While he likes the performances of Griffiths and Radcliffe - he has many problems with the actual play. Hmmm. Read on...
The young wizard has chosen wisely. Making his Broadway debut in Thea Sharrock's oddly arid revival of Peter Shaffer's "Equus," which opened Thursday night at the Broadhurst Theater, the 19-year-old film star Daniel Radcliffe steps into a mothball-preserved, off-the-rack part and wears it like a tailor's delight - that is, a natural fit that allows room to stretch. Would that the production around him, first presented in London, showed off Mr. Shaffer's 1973 psychodrama as flatteringly as it does its stage-virgin star.
There's no question that "Equus" has dated, particularly in its presentation of psychiatric investigations (something Mr. Shaffer humbly admits in a program note). But taking it too seriously may not be the best way to serve it in revival. This version had no crackling artificial fire to match the annoying smoke that kept rising through the stage floor. And as much as I admired the sensitivity and intelligence of Mr. Griffiths's and Mr. Radcliffe's performances, this revival might have been better off if everyone had just gone for the Gothic.
David Rooney - Variety - click HERE to read the full review.
Rooney and I don't quite see eye to eye either. He also finds fault with the play while praising the leads. Well...I never! Read for yourself...
Stunt casting in theater can do a disservice to playwrights, with famous faces often monopolizing attention while devaluing the merits of the work itself. But in his impressive debut in a major stage role, as the disturbed adolescent in "Equus," Daniel Radcliffe significantly helps overcome the fact that Peter Shaffer's 1975 Tony winner doesn't entirely hold up. The play is an astute career move for the "Harry Potter" frontman as he confidently navigates the transition from child stardom to adult roles -- and Radcliffe's performance provides "Equus" with a raw emotional nerve center that renders secondary any concerns about its wonky and over-explanatory psychology.
Clearly Harry Potter has something to celebrate tonight. Congrats to Radcliffe and Griffiths and best of luck on the rest of the run! My last thought for today, remember - the only way you can really know if you like a show - is to go SEE the show. If you would like to learn more about the Equus or purchase tickets - you can click HERE.
Tuesday night I attended a press preview of Equus. I went in with many questions. Would Radcliffe be up to the task? Would the nudity be gratuitous? Could I erase the image of Harry Potter from my mind as I watched the play? But, as the curtain went up and the opening image of Radcliffe, shirtless, surrounded by actors in metal horse heads came to life...all my questions and concerns seemed to disappear.
Equus, the play itself, is really quite riveting. Written in the 70's, nearly 35 years ago, the play really stands the test of time. Yes, some of the psychiatric techniques are dated, and some moments may lose their impact three decades later in this psycho-driven therapy filled world we live in. But, the building blocks of great theater are all on display here. Compelling conflict, nuanced characters, interesting subject matter. Equus shows us all of this and more.
The play is pretty simple. A young teen-age boy is brought to a psychiatric center for treatment. He has blinded several horses and has narrowly escaped prison in exchange for extensive counseling. Alan, the boy, is volatile and uncooperative and it is up to his doctor, Martin Dysart, to attempt to discover what has happened to the boy and help him stumble down a road to recovery.
Bringing this drama to life requires two great actors and this production has found them in Richard Griffiths and Daniel Radcliffe. Yup, you read that correctly - I said "great" and Daniel Radcliffe in the same sentence. I think everyone expected Mr. Griffiths to be great. He has already wowed New Yorkers in The History Boys several seasons back. But, Harry Potter, I think folks have been "gunning for him", so to speak. I am happy to report that he is marvelous in the role. Both actors should be favorably remembered at Tony time in the Spring. Radcliffe embodies his character and is the pulsing, dynamic, irrational center of Equus. He holds his own quite well with Mr. Griffiths and is especially powerful in his final scenes when he is forced to recount the tragic events that have been his undoing. These two are very nicely supported by a cast of New Yorkers (giving good accents). Anna Camp as the young stable girl and T. Ryder Smith particularly impressed this theatergoer.
I would be remiss if I did not mention the excellent directing of the production. Thea Sharrock, who directed the London run, does a wonderful job. It is a spare and sleek production. There is no actual set, really, several black cubes are moved around to create couches and chairs - and it works magnificently, allowing the shifts in time and place to happen in the blink of an eye with no effort. I was also quite impressed with her use of the horses. She used a stable of actors (pun intended) with simple metal horse heads, with raised hooves and dressed all in brown to create the much talked about group of horses. It was simple, evocative, powerful and moving (at times). Kudos to her creative team as well; set and costume designer John Napier, lighting designer David Hersey and sound designer Gregory Clarke.
Clearly, I enjoyed the show...now...let's see what the critics had to say about the latest arrival on "The Broadway".
Review Round-Up
Ben Brantley - The New York Times - click HERE to read the full review.
Mr. Brantley and I disagree, to some extent. While he likes the performances of Griffiths and Radcliffe - he has many problems with the actual play. Hmmm. Read on...
The young wizard has chosen wisely. Making his Broadway debut in Thea Sharrock's oddly arid revival of Peter Shaffer's "Equus," which opened Thursday night at the Broadhurst Theater, the 19-year-old film star Daniel Radcliffe steps into a mothball-preserved, off-the-rack part and wears it like a tailor's delight - that is, a natural fit that allows room to stretch. Would that the production around him, first presented in London, showed off Mr. Shaffer's 1973 psychodrama as flatteringly as it does its stage-virgin star.
There's no question that "Equus" has dated, particularly in its presentation of psychiatric investigations (something Mr. Shaffer humbly admits in a program note). But taking it too seriously may not be the best way to serve it in revival. This version had no crackling artificial fire to match the annoying smoke that kept rising through the stage floor. And as much as I admired the sensitivity and intelligence of Mr. Griffiths's and Mr. Radcliffe's performances, this revival might have been better off if everyone had just gone for the Gothic.
David Rooney - Variety - click HERE to read the full review.
Rooney and I don't quite see eye to eye either. He also finds fault with the play while praising the leads. Well...I never! Read for yourself...
Stunt casting in theater can do a disservice to playwrights, with famous faces often monopolizing attention while devaluing the merits of the work itself. But in his impressive debut in a major stage role, as the disturbed adolescent in "Equus," Daniel Radcliffe significantly helps overcome the fact that Peter Shaffer's 1975 Tony winner doesn't entirely hold up. The play is an astute career move for the "Harry Potter" frontman as he confidently navigates the transition from child stardom to adult roles -- and Radcliffe's performance provides "Equus" with a raw emotional nerve center that renders secondary any concerns about its wonky and over-explanatory psychology.
Clearly Harry Potter has something to celebrate tonight. Congrats to Radcliffe and Griffiths and best of luck on the rest of the run! My last thought for today, remember - the only way you can really know if you like a show - is to go SEE the show. If you would like to learn more about the Equus or purchase tickets - you can click HERE.
So well he is stepping out and trying different things, and thats great. I guess he's just too old for potter anymore but oh well the series almost ending. So well it would be great to see more of Radcliffe shwoing of his skills don't you think??
| 38 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog













